西安财经大学学报

优化重大生产力布局是构建新发展格局、推动高质量发展的战略基石，新质生产力以其高科技、高效能、高质量的核心特质，为破解传统布局模式下的深层矛盾提供了核心驱动。从理论逻辑看，新质生产力通过驱动布局范式从静态要素禀赋向动态创新生态转换，并重塑劳动者、劳动资料与劳动对象三大要素的时空配置逻辑，为赋能重大生产力布局提供了深刻的学理依据。从现实逻辑看，应对全球产业链供应链深度重构、破解国内区域发展不平衡、统筹高质量发展和高水平安全的迫切战略需求，构成了新质生产力赋能重大生产力布局的内在动力。从技术逻辑看，数字智能、绿色低碳、先进制造等前沿技术集群的融合应用，为布局的精准模拟、动态优化与网络化协同提供了关键工具支撑。然而，当前赋能进程仍面临区域布局惯性强大、创新要素流动受阻、关键核心技术自主可控不足、数据治理体系滞后以及体制机制改革迟滞等多维困境。为此，必须实施系统性战略：树立与践行国家战略功能导向的新型布局观，筑牢支撑战略性布局的新型基础设施与关键技术体系，打造服务于国家战略布局的高级要素精准配置机制，构建“核心—网络—备份”三位一体的国家战略空间组织形态，推动形成统筹国家战略布局的权威治理与政策协同体系，并深度参与全球创新网络以塑造有利外部环境。

Improving the distribution of major productive forces is the strategic cornerstone for creating a new development pattern and driving high-quality development.New quality productive forces, characterized by high technology, high efficiency, and high quality, serve as the core driver for resolving the deep-seated contradictions inherent in traditional distribution models.From a theoretical perspective, new quality productive forces drive the shift of distribution paradigms from static factor endowments to dynamic innovation ecosystems, reshaping the spatiotemporal allocation logic of laborers, means of labor, and objects of labor, thereby offering profound theoretical foundations for empowering the distribution of major productive forces.From a practical perspective, the urgent strategic needs to address the deep restructuring of global industrial and supply chains, resolve domestic regional development imbalances, and balance high-quality development with high-level security constitute the intrinsic drivers for such empowerment.From a technological perspective, the integrated application of frontier technology clusters, such as digital intelligence, green and low carbon, and advanced manufacturing, provides critical tools for precise simulation, dynamic optimization, and networked collaboration in the distribution.However, the current empowerment process still faces multidimensional obstacles, including strong inertia in regional distribution, obstructed flows of innovation factors, insufficient self-reliance and risk-resilience in core technologies in key fields, lagging data governance systems, and delayed institutional and mechanism reforms.To address these challenges, a systemic strategy should be implemented: establishing and practicing a new distribution philosophy oriented toward national strategic functions, fortifying the new infrastructure and key technology systems supporting strategic layouts, creating a precision allocation mechanism for advanced factors serving national strategic layouts, building a “core-network-backup” tripartite national strategic spatial organization model, fostering an authoritative governance and policy coordination system for coordinating national strategic layouts, and deeply engaging in global innovation networks to shape a favorable external environment.